Physical quality and grain yield of Azufrado beans in northern Sinaloa

Azufrado beans in northern Sinaloa

Authors

  • CP Sauceda Acosta Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Facultad de Agricultura del Valle del Fuerte, Calle 16 Av. Japaraqui S/N, Juan José Ríos, Ahome, Sinaloa. C.P. 81110.
  • FG Rodríguez Cota Campo Experimental Valle del Fuerte - INIFAP. Km 1609, Carretera Internacional México-Nogales, Juan José Ríos, Guasave, Sinaloa, C.P. 81110.
  • MA Cota Sandoval Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Facultad de Agricultura del Valle del Fuerte, Calle 16 Av. Japaraqui S/N, Juan José Ríos, Ahome, Sinaloa. C.P. 81110.
  • JL Flores Sánchez Yara México. Av. Américas 1545, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México, C.P. 44630.
  • RH Sauceda Acosta Campo Experimental Valle del Fuerte - INIFAP. Km 1609, Carretera Internacional México-Nogales, Juan José Ríos, Guasave, Sinaloa, C.P. 81110.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v25i3.1964

Keywords:

size, color, brightness, uminosity, coat

Abstract

The yield and physical quality of common bean grains influence
profitability and marketing. Its quantification allows the identification of genotype highlights. The aim of the
study was to evaluate these aspects in Azufrado Higuera and Azufrado Noroeste varieties and Mo 19-20-ERR2-9, Mo 19-20-ERR2-11, and Mo 19-20-ERR2-12 advanced lines. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with
four replications. The yield (t ha-1), 100-grain weight (HGW, g), and initial grain brightness (%) were measured on dry and clean samples. For each grain, digital image analysis was used to measure size (mm2), length, width, perimeter (mm), circularity, color, brightness, and luminosity. The yield was from 2.14 to 2.45 t ha-1 (p ≥ 0.05). Grain size correlated (p ≤ 0.05) with HGW (r = 0.97) and with its dimensions (r ≥ 0.94). Grain luminosity was higher in advanced lines (DSH = 0.74, p ≤ 0.05). Larger grains with less darkening evidenced better physical quality in Mo 19-20-ERR2-9 and Mo 19-20-ERR2-11 (p ≤ 0.05). Brightness and luminosity allow the identification coat darkening. Oxidation is slow in Azufrado Noroeste and Azufrado Higuera varieties, whereas Mo 19-20-ERR2-9, Mo 19-20-ERR2-11, and Mo 19-20-ERR2-12 lines have resistance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta, G.J.A., Jiménez, H.Y., Montero, T.V., Guzmán, M.S.H. y Anaya, L.J.L. 2016. San Rafael, nueva variedad de frijol pinto de reacción neutral al fotoperiodo para el centro de México. Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas 7(3): 717-722.

Anaya, J.L., Ibarra, F.J., Rodríguez, F.G., Ortega P.F., Acosta, J.A. y Chiquito, E. 2021. Leguminosas de grano en México: variedades mejoradas de frijol y garbanzo desarrolladas por el INIFAP. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas 12(25): 63-75.

Ayala, A.V., Acosta, J.A. y Reyes, L. 2021. El Cultivo del Frijol Presente y Futuro para México. Libro Técnico No. 1. INIFAP. CIRCE. Campo Experimental Bajío. Celaya Gto. México. 232 p.

Bento, A.C., Lanna, A.C., Bassinello, P.Z., Oomah, B.D., Pimenta, E.B., Carvalho, R.N. and Moreira, A.S. 2020. Aging indicators for stored carioca beans. Food research international 134: 109249.

Buzera, A., Kinyanjui, P., Ishara, J. and Sila, D. 2018. Physical and cooking properties of two varieties of bio-fortified common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in DR Congo. Food Science and Quality Management 71: 2225-0557.

CIAT. 1987. Sistema estándar para la evaluación de germoplasma de frijol. Schoonhoven, A. van y Pastor-Corrales, M. A. (comps.) Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical Cali, Colombia. 56 p.

da Silveira, P.M. and Stone, L.F. 2019. Competition limits of the yield components of the common bean ‘BRS Ártico’with white grains. Científica 47(1): 46-51.

Delfini, J., Moda, V., CdF. Ruas, dos Santos J., Ruas P.M., Buratto J., Ruas, E.A. and Gonçalves L:S. 2017. Distinctness of Brazilian common bean cultivars with carioca and black grain by means of morphoagronomic and molecular descriptors. PLoS ONE 12(11): e0188798.

Dumka, A., Ashok, A., Verma, P., and Verma, P. 2020. Advanced Digital Image Processing and its Applications in Big Data (1st ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

Duwadi, K., Austin, R.S., Mainali, H.R., Bett, K., Marsolais, F. and Dhaubhadel, S. 2018. Slow dark-ening of pinto bean seed coat is associated with significant metabolite and transcript differences related to proanthocyanidin biosynthesis. BMC genomics 19(1): 1-13.

Hu, Y. and Zhang, Z. 2021. GridFree: a python package of image analysis for interactive grain counting and measuring. Plant Physiology 186 (4): 2239-2252. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiab226.

Ibarra, P.F.J., Tosquy, V.O.H., Rodríguez, R.J.R., Villar, S.B., López, S.E. y Anaya, L.J.L. 2022. Rubí: nueva variedad mejorada de frijol negro para las áreas tropicales de Veracruz y Chiapas. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas 13(3): 577-585.

Jacinto, H.C., Bernal L.I., Garza, G.R., y Garza G.D. 2017. Cambios poscosecha en frijol durante el almacenamiento prolongado en contraste con el envejecimiento acelerado. Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas 8(8): 1827-1837.

Kalauni, S. and Dhakal, D. 2020. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of seed yield and yield components of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in sub-tropical region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 8(9): 1928-1934.

Langat, C., Ombori, O., Leley, P., Karanja, D., Cheruiyot, R., Gathaara, M. and Masila, B. 2019. Genetic variability of agronomic traits as potential indicators of drought tolerance in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). International Journal of Agronomy, Article ID 2360848, doi:10.1155/2019/2360848.

Meenu, M., Kurade, C., Neelapu, B.C., Kalra, S., Ramaswamy, H.S. and Yu, Y. 2021. A concise review on food quality assessment using digital image processing. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 118: 106-124.

Mesera, E., Shifaraw, G., Alamerew, S. and Amsalu, B. 2022. Genetic variability analysis and association of traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces collected from Ethiopia at Jimma. Ad-vances in Agriculture, Article ID 4400711, doi:10.1155/2022/4400711.

Nunes, H.D., Leal, F.T., Mingotte, F.L.C., Damião, V.D., Junior, P.A.C. and Lemos, L.B. 2020. Ag-ronomic performance, quality and nitrogen use efficiency by common bean cultivars. Journal of Plant Nutrition 44(7): 995-1009. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1849292.

R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statis-tical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/.

Rosales, S.R. y Flores G. H. 2022. PID 1: Variedad de frijol pinto con semillas de oscurecimiento lento para riego en Durango, México. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 45(1):145-147.

Rosales, S.R., Nava, C.A., González, H., Herrera, M.D., Jiménez, J.C., Ramírez, N.Y. y Osuna, E.S. 2014. Rendimiento, preferencia y calidad de enlatado de variedades de frijol pinto producidas en Durango, México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas 5(2): 309-315.

Salinas, P.R.A., Rodríguez, C.F.G., Padilla, V.I., Valencia, M.Y., Ortiz, C.H.G., y Acosta G.J.A. 2012. Janasa, nueva variedad de frijol tipo azufrado para el estado de Sinaloa, México. Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas 3(2): 397-402.

Singh, Y. and Chandra, S. 2020. Study to assess physical properties of different types of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 9(2): 2455-2459.

SNICS (Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas). 2017. Guía técnica para la des-cripción varietal. Frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). 2a (Ed.). SAGARPA. SNICS. Coyoacán, Cd. de México. 36 p.

Spitti, A.M.D.S., Carbonell, S.A.M., Dias, C.T.D.S., Sabino, L.G., Carvalho, C.R.L. and Chiorato A.F. 2019. Carioca bean genotypes for tolerance to grain darkening by natural and accelerated methods. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 43:e012519.

Uebersax, M. A., Siddiq, M., Cramer, J., and Bales, S. 2022. Harvesting, postharvest handling, distri-bution, and marketing of dry beans. In: Dry Beans and Pulses: Production, Processing, and Nutrition, M. Siddiq and M. A. Uebersax (Eds.), (Second ed.) pp. 81– 104. John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119776802.ch4

UPOV. 2013. Technical Working Party on Automation and Computer Programs- Revision of Document TGP/8: Part II: Techniques Used in DUS Examination, New Section: Examining Characteristics Using Image Analysis. International Union for the Protection of new Varieties of Plants. Seoul, Republic of Korea. 27 p. [Consultado 10 enero 2022]. Disponible en: http://www.upov.int/edocs/mdocs/upov/en/twc_31/twc_31_20.pdf

UPOV. 2015. Unión Internacional para la Protección de las Obtenciones Vegetales. Directrices para la ejecución del examen de la distinción, la homogeneidad y la estabilidad, para judía común, Alubia (Phaseolus vulgaris). Documento TG/12/9 Rev. 2, International Union for the Protection of new Varieties of Plants. Ginebra, Suiza. 47 p. [Consultado 10 enero 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.upov.int/edocs/tgdocs/es/tg012.pdf

Varga, F., Vidak, M., Ivanović, K., Lazarević, B., Širić, I., Srečec, S., Šatović, Z. and Carović, K. 2019. How does Computer vision compare to standard colorimeter in assessing the seed coat color of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)?. Journal of Central European Agriculture 20(4): 1169-1178.

Wallander-Compean, L., Almaraz-Abarca, N., Alejandre-Iturbide, G., Uribe-Soto, J.N., Ávila-Reyes, J.A., Torres-Ricario, R., Herrera-Arrieta, Y. and Delgado-Alvarado, E.A. 2022. Variación fenológica y morfométrica de Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) de cinco poblaciones silvestres de Durango, Mé-xico. Botanical Sciences 100(3): 563-578.

Wu, J., Wang, L., Fu, J., Chen, J., Wei, S., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Tang, Y., Chen, M., Zhu, J., Lei, L., Geng, Q., Liu C., Wu, L., Li X., Wang, X., Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Xing S., Zhang H., Blair M.W. and Wang S. 2019. Resequencing of 683 common bean genotypes identifies yield component trait as-sociations across a north–south cline. Nature Genetics, 52(1): 118-125. doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0546-0.

Ziegler, V., Paraginski, R.T. and Ferreira, C.D. 2021. Grain storage systems and effects of moisture, temperature and time on grain quality-A review. Journal of Stored Products Research 91: 101770.

Graphical abstract

Published

2023-09-29

How to Cite

Sauceda Acosta, C. P., Rodríguez Cota, F. G., Cota Sandoval, M. A., Flores Sánchez, J. L., & Sauceda Acosta, R. H. (2023). Physical quality and grain yield of Azufrado beans in northern Sinaloa: Azufrado beans in northern Sinaloa. Biotecnia, 25(3), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v25i3.1964

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Metrics

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.