Yield components in safflower under minimum tillage and crop rotation compared to traditional tillage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v26.2317Keywords:
monocultive, conservation tillage, Carthamus tinctorius LAbstract
In safflower, studies on the impact of conservation tillage (LC) on yield and its components are limited, so the objective of this study was to evaluate grain yield and yield components in conventional tillage (LT) and LC with crop rotation. The study was conducted in southern Sonora, Mexico, during the fall-winter 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 cycles. The experimental design was randomized blocks with factorial arrangement, the treatments were the rotation safflower/corn, safflower/wheat and safflower/safflower in LC and safflower/safflower in LT, the variety used was SEMAY OL. Agronomic variables and yield were determined. The highest grain yield was obtained in the safflower/corn and safflower/wheat rotation in LC, while the lowest yield was in monoculture in LC and LT. The tillage system showed no effect on weight of a thousand grain (PMG), plants m-2 and stem diameter. The number of chapters m-2, the PMG, the grain weight and the number of grains per chapter showed a positive association with the grain yield. The tillage system in combination with crop rotation has an influence on the yield components with the exception of PMG. Crop rotation in the LC system allows to increase the yield of this oilseed.
Downloads
References
Ávila C. E., Ochoa, E. X. M., Montoya, C. L. M., Aguilera, N. A., Borbón, G. A., y Padilla, P. J. I., 2012. Chey-ol: nueva variedad de cártamo oleica para el noroeste de México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 8(5): 1209-1212.
Borbón, G. A., Lugo, G. G. A. Reyes, O. A. Valenzuela, H. V., y Sauceda, A. C. P., 2020. Rotación de trigo, maíz y cártamo en labranza de conservación vs. labranza tradicional. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 43(4): 371-378. doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2020.4.371.
Borbón G. A., Montoya C. L., Ochoa E. X. M., Aguilera M. N. A., Ávila C., E., y Cota B. C. I., 2019. SEMAY OL, Nueva variedad de cártamo oleica. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 42(1): 83-85. doi:10.35196/rfm.2019.1.83-85.
CONAGUA, Comisión Nacional del Agua, 2020. Resúmenes Mensuales de Temperaturas y Lluvia. Servicio Meteorológico Nacional, Comisión Nacional del Agua. Ciudad de México. Disponible en: https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/temperaturas-y-lluvias/resumenes-mensuales-de-temperaturas-y-lluvias.
da Silva, C. J., da Silva, A. C., Zoz, T., Toppa, E. V. B., Silva P. B., and Zanotto, M. D., 2015. Genetic divergence among accessions of Carthamus tinctorius L. by morphoagronomic traits. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 10(52): 4825-4830. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2015.9859.
FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2021. Producción mundial de cultivos. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QCL.
FIRA, Fideicomisos Instituidos en Relación con la Agricultura. 2018. Sistema de costos agrícolas. Resumen de costos. Disponible en: https://www.fira.gob.mx/InfEspDtoXML/TemasUsuario.jsp.
Hussain, T., Tariq, M. A., Ahmad, I., Saghir, M., Batool, M., Safdar, M., Sher A., and Tariq, M., 2014. Characters Association Analysis in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 4(6): 63-65.
Küçük, H., and Akbolat, D., 2018. Investigation of different tillage and seeding methods in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivation. Scientific Papers Series A. Agronomy. 61(1): 481-486.
Kumari, S., Choudhary, R. C., Kumara Swamy, R. V., Saharan, V., Joshi, A., and Munot, J., 2017. Assessment of genetic diversity in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes through morphological and SSR marker. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 6(5): 2723-31.
Larson, C. D., Menalled, F. D., Lehnhoff, E. A., and Seipel, T., 2021. Plant community responses to integrating livestock into a reduced-till organic cropping system. Ecosphere. 12(3): 1-15. doi.org/e03412.10.1002./ecs23412.
Raei, Y., Garebagh, F. P., and Weisany, W., 2014. Effects of Plant Density and Sowing date on some Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of forage Sorghum as Second Cropping. Advances in Bio Research. 5(2): 114-118. doi:10.15515/abr.0976-4585.5.2.114118.
Raju, T. J., Sultana, R., Palchamy K., and Keshavulu, K., 2019. Study on relationships among seed yield components in in F3:4 population in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 8(1): 2205-2207.
Rebetzke, G. J., Bonnett, D. G., and Reynolds, M. P. 2016. Awns reduce grain number to increase grain size and harvestable yield in irrigated and rainfed spring wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany. 67(9): 2573-2586. doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw081.
Sayama, T., Tanabata, T., Saruta, M., Yamada, T., Anai, T., Kaga, A., and Ishimoto, M. 2017. Confirmation of the pleiotropic control of leaflet shape and number of seeds per pod by the Ln gene in induced soybean mutants. Breeding Science. 67(4): 363-369.
SIAP, Servicio de información y estadística agroalimentaria y pesquera. 2019. Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), Sonora, México. Disponible en: http://www.siap.gob.mx.
SIAP-SIACON-NG, Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera-Sistema de Información Agroalimentaria de Consulta-Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. 2020. Disponible en: https://nube.siap.gob.mx/avance_agricola/.
Singh, S., Angadi, S. V., Hilaire, R. S., Grover, K., and VanLeeuwen, D. M., 2016. Spring safflower performance under growth stage based irrigation in the southern high plains. Crop Science. 56(4): 1878-1889. doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.08.0481.
Sirel, Z. and Aytaç, Z., 2016. Relationships between the seed yield and some agronomic characteristics of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under semi-arid conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 21(1): 29-35. DOI:10.17557/tjfc.50988.
Valadez G. J., y Cervantes M. J. E., 2017. Promesa, variedad de polinización libre de cártamo para la región de las huastecas. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 40(1): 103-105. doi:10.35196/rfm.2017.1.103-105.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal Biotecnia is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
_(1)_(1).png){kind=spacer}
_(2).jpg)
