Effect of variety and seedtime on the productive potential of sugar beet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v22i3.969Keywords:
Beta vulgaris, tuber, yieldAbstract
Sugar beet is traditionally grown in temperate zones, although the development of new varieties allows its exploitation in tropical and subtropical regions. However, in order to obtain good yields and high quality, it is essential to evaluate varieties and sowing dates before establishment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the productive potential of three sugar beet varieties (Coronado, Syngenta, and SesVanderHaven) in two sowing dates in the Experimen- tal Field of the University of Sonora, under split-plot design. The variety and sowing date had a significant effect on tuber diameter, total soluble solids (TSS) and foliage production. The Coronado variety sowing in November had the highest tubers production (109.2 t.ha-1) and highest TSS content (19.3°Brix), while the highest foliage production (25.4 t.ha-1) in dry weight was obtained in the Coronado cultivar sowing in October. The tubers yields and TSS obtained under the agroecological conditions of this study are similar to the highest values reported in the literature, so it is concluded that under the climatic conditions of this study, it is feasible to ultivate the three varieties evaluated in the two dates of sowing proposed with yields comparable to commercial exploitations.Downloads
References
Abd El Tawab, A. M., Mohsen Hassan, A. A., Ellatif Khattab, M. S. A., Hefny Matloup, O., Abdelkader Farahat, E. S., Samir Khalel, M., Abdelfattah Morsy, T. y Tawfeek Fouad, M. 2017. Productive performance of lactating frisian cows fed sugar beet leaves silage treated with lactic acid bacteria. International Journal of Zoological Research 13: 74-82.
Ahmad, S., Zubair, M., Iqbal, N., Mahmood, N. y Mahmood, K. 2012. Evaluation of sugar hybrid varieties under Thal-Kumbi soil series of Pakistan. International. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 4: 605-608.
Al-Jbawi, E., Al Geddawi, S. y Alesha, G. 2015. Quality changes in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) roots during storage period in piles. International Journal of Environment 4: 77-85.
Alvarado Padilla, J.I., Ávila Casillas, E., Camarillo Pulido, M., Ochoa Espinoza, X. M y Zamarripa Colmenero, A. 2011. Producción de Remolacha Azucarera en el Valle de Mexicali, B.C. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro de Investigación Regional del Noroeste. Folleto Técnico No. 19. Mexicali, BC. ISBN: 9786074256758.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15 ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Arlington, VA.
Armenta Cejudo, A., Rodríguez Hernández, R., Ochoa Espinoza X., Borbón García, A., Cantúa, Ayala, J.A., Valenzuela Herrera, V., Valenzuela Borbón, R. y Montoya Coronado, L. 2012. Análisis económico del sorgo dulce y remolacha azucarera con los cultivos tradicionales del Valle del Yaqui. En: Uso de la biodiversidad para bioenergía y biocombustibles en la zona árida de México. Castellanos Villegas, A. E. y M. Esqueda Valle (ed), pp. 209-230. Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Brar, N.S., Dhillon, B.S., Saini, K. y Sharma, P. 2015. Agronomy of sugarbeet cultivation-A review. Agricultural Reviews 36: 184-197.
CONAGUA (Comisión Nacional del Agua). 2014. Estadísticas del agua en México, edición 2014. SEMARNAT-CONAGUA. México, D. F.
Cosyn, S., Van der Woude, K., Sauvenier, X. y Evrard, J.N. 2011. Sugar beet: A complement to sugar cane for sugar and ethanol production in tropical and subtropical areas. International Sugar Journal 113: 120-123.
Hassanli, A.M., Ahmadirad, S. y Beecham, S. 2010. Evaluation of influence of irrigation methods and water quality on sugar beet yield and water use efficiency. Agricultural Water Management 97:357-362.
INIFAP, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. http://clima.inifap.gob.mx/redinifap/variables.aspx=27797.
Kaffka S.R., and Grantz D.A. Sugar Crops. In: Neal Van Alfen, editor-in-chief. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, Vol. 5, San Diego: Elsevier; 2014. pp. 240-260.
Kiymaz, S. y Ertek, A. 2015. Yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) at different water and nitrogen levels under the climatic conditions of Kırsehir, Turkey. Agricultural Water Management 158: 156-165.
Lafaux, M.P., Bastidas, J.A. y Insuasty, E. 2015. Efecto de la vovinaza en la composición nutricional del tubérculo de remolacha forrajera (Beta vulgaris) en el municipio de Pasto, Departamento de Nariño. Revista Ciencia Animal 9: 209-221.
Macías Duarte, R., Grijalva Contreras, R.L. y Robles Contreras, F. 2012. Efecto de la variedad y fecha de trasplante sobre el rendimiento y calidad de lechuga. Biotecnia. XV (2): 21-24.
Mirzaei, M.R. y Abdollahian-Noghabi, M. 2012. Study of sugar beet growth pattern in Hamedan, Iran. Journal of Sugar Beet 27: 1-9.
Mohamed, H.Y. y Yasin, M.A.T. 2013. Response of some sugar beet varieties to harvesting dates and foliar application of boron and zinc in sandy soils. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 35: 227-252.
Mubarak, M.U., Zahir, M., Ahmad, S. y Wakee, A. 2016. Sugar beet yield and industrial sugar contents improved by potassium fertilization under scarce and adequate moisture conditions. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 15: 2620-2626.
Ochoa, X.M., Borbón, A., Montoya, L., Alvarado, I., Macías, J., Aguilera, N.A. y Zamarripa, A. 2011. Tecnología para producir remolacha azucarera en el sur de sonora. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Ed. Lope Montoya Coronado. 30 p.
Quintero, Q.R., Mateus, C.L., Muñoz, L.G. y Torrez, J.M. 2008. Obtención de bioetanol carburante a partir de la remolacha forrajera (Beta vulgaris L.) como alternativa para biomas premontano-montano bajo. Clepsidra 12: 47-53.
Quintero, Q.R. y Hanssen, H. 2006. La remolacha forrajera (Beta vulgaris L.) como cultivo energético y viable para la producción de bioetanol carburante en la sabana de Bogotá-Colombia. Clepsidra 3: 105-111.
Rajabi A., Khayamim, S., Abbasi, Z. y Ober, E. 2014. Salt Stress and Sugar Beet Improvement: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Ahmad P., Wani M., Azooz M., Phan Tran L.S. (Eds.) Improvement of Crops in the Era of Climatic Changes. Springer, New York, NY. Pp 121-150.
SAS. 1994. SAS/STAT User´s Guide. Release 6.08 Version. Cary: SAS Institute Inc. 705 p.
Singh Brar, N., Singh, B., Saint, K.S. y Sharma, P.K. 2015. Agronomy of sugarbeet cultivation-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 36: 184-197.
Stevens, W.B., Evans, R.G., Jabro, J.D y Iversen, W.M. 2011. Sugarbeet productivity as influenced by fertilizer band depth and nitrogen rate in strip tillage. Journal of Sugar Beet Research 48: 137-154.
Venegas-González, J., Méndez-Inocencio, C., Martínez-Mendoza, E.K., Ceja-Torres, L.F. y Rodríguez-Torres, M.D. 2019. Producción orgánica de Beta vulgaris Subespecie cicla con inoculantes microbianos. Biotecnia XXI: 121-126.
Yonts, C.D. 2006. Sugar beet response to irrigation method and polymer placed in the seed furrow. Journal or Sugar Beet Research 43: 155-166.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The journal Biotecnia is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
_(1)_(1).png){kind=spacer}
_(2).jpg)
